Recent statements by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the World Economic Forum in Davos have sounded a clarion call that should alarm every American: the era of U.S.-led global dominance is over. Carney declared that the "old order is not coming back," signaling a seismic shift in the international system that poses grave dangers to our nation’s security, economy, and global influence (Yousif, 2026).

Eroding Global Leadership and Putting United States Citizens and Country at Risk
According to a recent White House fact sheet, the decision to withdraw from numerous international organizations and treaties represents a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy (The White House, 2026). Historically, active U.S. participation in global institutions has been a cornerstone of American leadership, allowing the country to influence international norms, promote security, and protect its national interests. However, recent actions to disengage—from organizations like the World Health Organization, the Paris Climate Agreement, the UN Human Rights Council, and others—have effectively diminished the United States' role on the world stage. This retreat from international engagement has led to a loss of influence, weakened alliances, and reduced capacity to shape global policies that impact national security, economic prosperity, and public health. Consequently, this approach risks isolating the U.S., undermining its leadership, and exposing citizens to increased global instability and threats.

With the U.S. withdrawing from numerous international organizations and treaties, the United States has abdicated its role as a global leader. This retreat diminishes America’s influence on critical issues like climate change, human rights, and global security, leaving a leadership vacuum. Without active participation and engagement, the U.S. risks losing strategic alliances, economic stability, and soft power—weakening its ability to shape international policies that protect its citizens. This decline in global presence not only devalues the nation’s standing but also exposes Americans to greater threats, from international instability to global health crises, ultimately jeopardizing the safety, prosperity, and security of all Americans.

Abstract:
The expansion of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the Trump administration's 2025 policies has led to unprecedented increases in enforcement budgets, staffing, and aggressive tactics, often at the expense of vital public programs. This shift has diverted funds away from essential federal departments responsible for healthcare, safety, and environmental quality, jeopardizing Americans' well-being. This article explores the implications of these policies, highlights the lack of accountability and oversight within ICE, and presents peaceful avenues for public engagement—including protests and congressional advocacy—to promote responsible governance and protect community safety.

Diverting funds from essential public programs to support an over-militarized ICE undermines community well-being and civil liberties. Citizens must remain vigilant, advocate peacefully, and hold elected officials accountable to ensure government priorities serve all Americans’ safety, health, and rights.

Kochi, S., & Mueller, J. (2026, January 2). GOP lawmakers, frustrated with dysfunctional Congress, head for the exits. The Hill.

​On July 4, 2025, Public Law 119-21, Budget Reconciliation Act (also called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act)
–was signed into law. Presented as a middle-class tax relief and national investment, the bill instead reshapes federal priorities across nutrition assistance, healthcare, higher education, immigration,
environmental protection, and tax policy. Its combined effects will unfold gradually, placing new
administrative burdens on low-income households while expanding federal enforcement and
reducing long-term public-health and climate investments.

​Nutrition and  SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program): Increased Requirements and Narrower Eligibility
The law expands work and community-engagement requirements for many adults receiving
SNAP and limits states’ ability to waive those requirements based on local labor conditions. It
also removes internet service fees from allowable shelter deductions, which may lower benefits
for households already managing high utility costs. Eligibility is newly restricted to citizens,
permanent residents, certain humanitarian categories, and specific Pacific Islander statuses
–excluding many other legally present immigrants.

​Healthcare Access: Administrative Barrier and Coverage Gaps
The bill requires states to implement work or community-engagement criteria for certain adults
on Medicaid, despite evidence that such requirements reduce enrollment rather than increase
employment. It also adds new immigration-related restrictions for the premium tax credit and
tightens documentation requirements for coverage.

Higher Education: New Loan Limits and Reduced Pathways to Relief
Graduate and professional PLUS loans and eliminated, forcing many students to rely on capped
federal loans or private financing. Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) is revised, and
borrower-defense and closed-school discharge protections are delayed.

​Immigration: Higher Fees and Expanded Enforcement Infrastructure
The law raises fees across asylum, Temporary Protected Status, work authorization, and
adjustment-of-status processes. It also directs federal resources to additional detention capacity,
border infrastructure, personnel, and law-enforcement training.

Environmental and Climate Programs: Major Funding Cuts
The bill rescinds funding from dozens of environmental and climate initiatives, including air-
quality programs, environmental justice grants, clean-vehicle investments, and NOAA climate
monitoring.

​Tax Provisions: Continued Benefits for Higher-Income Households
The law extends and expands several 2017 tax provisions, including reduced individual tax rates,
increased standard deductions, expanded business-expensing options, and exclusions for tips,
overtime, and car-loan interest.

What We Can Do
Although many provisions of the law will phase in over several years, there are meaningful steps
individuals and communities can take now to stay prepared and reduce potential harm.

• Staying informed through trusted, nonpartisan sources helps households anticipate changes to SNAP, Medicaid, student aid, immigration fees, and environmental programs – and reduces the risk of losing access due to missed deadlines or new documentation requirements. 
  • Find your local health department in the Directory of Local Health Departments - NACCHO
• Sharing accurate information within neighborhoods, workplaces, and cultural communities ensures people are not caught off guard by new requirements.
• Mutual aid remains a powerful tool, whether through food distribution, transportation support, childcare assistance, or contributions to local emergency or immigration funds.
• Community organizations – such as legal-aid offices, clinics, food banks, and environmental-justice groups – will see increased need, and volunteering even a small amount of time helps strengthen the safety net that many families rely on.
• Regularly contacting representatives signals public concern and shapes oversight as agencies implement the law.
• Individuals can also participate in public comment periods, which influence how federal agencies interpret and finalize rules. Joining or supporting civic groups – unions, PTAs, faith communities, or neighborhood associations – helps build collective capacity to respond. Finally, households potentially affected by benefit changes or rising fees might prepare early by updating documents, reviewing eligibility, and consulting legal-aid resources.

 
While the law centralizes major decisions at federal and state levels, communities still shape how
its impacts unfold. Staying informed, supporting one another, and engaging consistently in civic
life influences how policies are interpreted, enforced, and reconsidered over time. Because
implementation will stretch across years, steady engagement ensures the lived experiences of
ordinary people guide oversight, future amendments, and the policymaking that follows. 

Abstract
Measles remains one of the most highly contagious viral diseases affecting populations worldwide. Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, recent policy shifts and substantial federal funding cuts in 2025 have significantly weakened the United States' public health infrastructure, leading to the closure of vaccination clinics, staff layoffs, and declining immunization rates. These developments have contributed to a resurgence of measles cases at levels not seen in decades, threatening progress toward eradication. This article traces the historical development of measles, highlights its clinical features—including its high transmissibility and potential for severe complications—and discusses how recent policy and funding challenges have increased the risk of outbreaks. It underscores the critical importance of maintaining high vaccination coverage and robust public health systems to prevent future transmission and protect vulnerable communities.

Airborne and Surface Transmission:
Measles virus can live for up to two hours in the air in droplets expelled when infected persons cough or sneeze, and on surfaces they touch. This high level of environmental stability contributes to its extreme contagiousness.

Symptoms Include:

• High fever (up to 40.6°C/105°F)
• A blotchy red rash that starts on the face and spreads downward
• Cough
• Runny nose (coryza)
• Conjunctivitis (red, watery eyes)
• Koplik spots (see below): tiny, bluish-white spots with a red background inside the mouth, often on the cheeks, appearing 2–3 days before the rash and signaling early infection

​Clinical Course:
The course typically unfolds in three stages:

• Prodromal phase (2–4 days): Mild symptoms like fever, cough, runny nose, conjunctivitis, and Koplik spots.
• Rash phase (3–5 days): Rash appears and spreads; high fever persists.
• Recovery or complications: Fever subsides as rash fades; complications such as pneumonia or encephalitis may develop, especially in unvaccinated or vulnerable children.​​

Recent Federal Actions and the Resurgence of Measles in the U.S.
In 2025, the United States faced a significant setback in its fight against measles due to recent federal government actions by the current administration, including substantial funding cuts and policy shifts. These reductions have profoundly weakened the nation’s public health infrastructure, leading to the cancellation of numerous local vaccination clinics and a sharp decline in vaccination rates across many states.
​
Key Effects of These Changes Include:

• Closure of Vaccination Clinics:
  Abrupt cuts to federal grants—such as the approximately $11.4 billion in COVID-era funds allocated to state and local health departments—forced the closure of many free or low-cost vaccination clinics in states like Texas, Minnesota, Washington, and Arizona. This has limited access to vaccines, especially for vulnerable and low-income populations who rely on these services.
• Staff Layoffs and Reduced Capacity:
  Funding reductions have led to the elimination of hundreds of jobs at the CDC and thousands more at state and local health departments. These staff members are responsible for immunization programs, disease surveillance, and outbreak response. Their absence hampers the ability of public health officials to monitor, contain, and respond effectively to outbreaks.
• Weakened Global Health Efforts:
  Cuts to U.S. foreign aid, including the termination of funding for WHO’s Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, have compromised international measles control efforts. Increased global cases raise the risk of imported cases triggering new outbreaks within under-vaccinated U.S. communities.
• Erosion of Vaccine Confidence:
  Recent policy actions and high-profile misinformation have contributed to a broader decline in trust towards health authorities and vaccines. This has led to increased vaccine skepticism, further lowering routine childhood immunization rates nationwide, with some areas falling below the herd immunity threshold of 95%.
• Surge in Cases:
  As a direct consequence of these factors, the U.S. experienced a dramatic resurgence of measles cases in 2025—the highest levels in decades. Public health experts attribute the surge to the combination of federal funding cuts, diminished local response capacity, and declining vaccination coverage. The United States is experiencing more measles infections than in over 30 years, with outbreaks linked to vaccine hesitancy and declining immunization rates. Most of these cases are among unvaccinated individuals. 

​Impact on Public Health and Eradication Goals
These developments have created what experts describe as a "perfect storm" that threatens to undo decades of progress. The increased transmission and reduced capacity for outbreak response put the U.S. at risk of losing its official measles elimination status, especially as these trends continue, with children and those who are not vaccinated at severe risk.

Severity and Preventability
​The severity of measles varies widely, influenced by age, nutritional status, immune health, and healthcare access. While many children recover without significant issues, the disease can cause serious complications, including:

• Pneumonia: Responsible for up to 60% of measles-related deaths
• Encephalitis: Brain swelling leading to permanent neurological damage or death
• Diarrhea and dehydration
• Otitis media (ear infections)
• Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE): A rare, fatal degenerative disease developing years later

​Vaccination—which is about 97% effective after two doses—is the most powerful tool to prevent these outcomes. High coverage (over 95%) creates herd immunity, protecting those who cannot be vaccinated, such as infants under 9 months and immunocompromised children.
​
​The American Academy of Pediatrics emphasizes that vaccination is critical to building the strongest immunity in children and preventing further outbreaks.

Key message for parents:

• Most recent cases are in unvaccinated children.
• The MMR vaccine offers safe, effective, and long-lasting protection.
• Parents are encouraged to consult their pediatrician with questions about the vaccine or measles.

Conclusion
Measles remains highly contagious, capable of spreading rapidly through airborne droplets and contaminated surfaces, often before symptoms appear. Its clinical course can escalate from mild symptoms to life-threatening complications, especially in unvaccinated children. Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent infection and severe disease, protect vulnerable populations, and move toward eradication.
​
However, in the U.S., recent reductions in surveillance and prevention funding have limited efforts to control outbreaks. Many state and local health departments now rely heavily on community clinics and programs—such as the California Department of Public Health’s free immunization services to help children get vaccinated. Find your state or local health department by searching with your zip code at the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO).

Organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), other vaccine advocates continue to provide resources and guidance to ensure children are protected. Parents are urged to seek vaccination and utilize available local resources to safeguard their children from measles. Additional vaccine promotion organizations include:

United States-Focused & Professional

• National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID): Supports prevention of infectious diseases through vaccination.
• American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP): Childhood immunization schedules.
• American Nurses Association (ANA): Supports vaccine advocacy and education. 
• Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (SAHM)
• Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM)

 
Global & International

• Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance: A public-private partnership to increase access to immunization.
• UNICEF: Community engagement for immunization programs.
• World Health Organization (WHO): Global health authority.
• Sabin Vaccine Institute: A non-profit dedicated to vaccine development and access. 

Table 1: Number of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Detainee Deaths by Year
Illustrates the number of deaths among detainees in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) centers by year, with elevated levels shown during the 1st Trump administration in 2020 and current Trump administration so far in 2025.

Join the Fight for Humanity
By choosing not to support corporations that enable systemic abuse, we send a clear message: human rights, dignity, and justice are non-negotiable. This Thanksgiving, let’s prioritize compassion over profit. Let’s stand together for the rights of every person—regardless of immigration status—and demand a future rooted in fairness, respect, and humanity.

Learn more and take action at We Ain’t Buying It!.
Together, we can make a difference. Speak out.

• Take action
  
• Take the Pledge
  
• Contact Congress Now! Demand a world where justice prevails over fear and exploitation.
  
• Share the following downloadable materials on social media.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

New Report Highlights Lessons from the Epstein Case on Power, Survivors, and the Fight for Justice
San Diego — November 12, 2025 — A new in-depth report titled "What the Epstein Case Teaches Us About Power, Survivors, and Accountability" examines the ongoing implications of Jeffrey Epstein’s scandal, revealing critical insights into systemic failures, the importance of transparency, and the urgent need for justice for survivors of sexual abuse.

Despite Epstein’s death in 2019, the fight for truth and accountability continues in 2025. The report underscores how privilege, secrecy, and influence have historically protected powerful offenders while silencing victims. It details the unresolved questions surrounding Epstein’s covert dealings, the delayed release of files, and the broader societal failure to hold perpetrators accountable.

“This case is a stark reminder of how systemic power can distort justice and how institutional betrayal compounds trauma for survivors,” said The CIRCLE, the report’s author. “It also highlights the critical need for transparency and legislative action to prevent future abuses of power.”

The report explores key issues including the 2008 non-prosecution agreement, the ongoing fight to unseal Epstein’s files, and the consequences of delayed justice. It emphasizes that the Epstein case is not isolated but a “stress test” for how society responds to sexual violence involving the powerful.

What You Can Do:
The report concludes with actionable steps, urging the public to support legislative efforts like the Epstein Files Transparency Act and to back survivor-centered organizations advocating for justice and healing.

Download the full report and learn how we can work together to promote transparency, accountability, and justice for survivors. For additional reports visit Reports - THE CIRCLE.

Contact: ​[email protected]